logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.04.27 2018고단287
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 26, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (diceless driving) on the road near the synthetic Dong, Masan-si, Changwon-si, Masan-si, and C, which is located in Changwon-si, Nowon-si, Seoul, and up to the front road, driven a Dice-type car without obtaining a driver’s license from about 100 meters of alcohol concentration in blood while under the influence of alcohol with about 0.185% while under the influence of alcohol.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a car in a DSpo area.

On January 26, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol as set forth in paragraph (1) of the No. 23:59 on January 26, 2018, and driven the four-lane road from the border to the bus terminal in the Msan City, Msan-si, the Changwon-si, along the two-lane.

At the time of night, the person engaged in driving service had a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by making it possible to see the right and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, neglected it while under the influence of alcohol and stopped on the three-lanes of the two-lanes and the three-lanes in order to board customers, and discovered at the latest the Fstynael taxi driven by the Victim E (51) of the Victim E (51) who was making a stop on the three-lanes to board, but did not stop, and did not stop, and the part left behind the left side of the said taxi was shocked with the part front of the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim E, such as salt ties and tensions that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment, injury to the victim G (the victim (the victim) who was aboard the cab in the victim E-si, suffered from approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the rain, etc. that had no room in the two open fields where medical treatment is required for about two weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim H (the passenger) who is also the same passenger, suffered from approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow