logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.09.27 2013고단2813
사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on June 15, 2012, after having been sentenced to one year for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., at the Suwon District Court on June 15, 2012, the execution of the above sentence was completed on March 22, 2013.

1. From June 6, 2013 to June 17:30, 2013, Defendant A operated the “E Game Establishment” on the first floor of the Seo-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon D, Daejeon: (a) installed a total of 80 games, which are both game products and speculative electronic game instruments not classified by the Game Rating Board; (b) 40 game machine; (c) 20 game machine; (d) multiple game machine; and (e) 10 game machine; and (e) provided many unspecified customers with a total of 10,00 won ticket in the game machine; and (e) provided them with a game machine to enable them to acquire points on the game screen, and exchange the remaining points after deducting 10% of the fees from the points acquired; and (e) provided them with an electronic game machine, and (e) provided them with a speculative act using the electronic game machine.

2. Defendant B, a business owner, while working as an employee at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), provided game products that he did a speculative act by using the game products that was not classified as above, and aided and abetted Defendant B, despite being aware of the fact that he was engaged in a speculative act by using speculative electronic machines, provided customer contact and heart scambling, supervised the visitors, and aided and abetted Defendant B by separating the hard disks installed inside the game machine without opening iron doors at the entrance of the game room when the game room was controlled by the police while monitoring the visitors.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement;

1. The police seizure report and seizure list;

1. The response to the result of control support (Yengsung et al., Book I);

1. An inquiry report (A), such as criminal records, and an investigation report (verification of suspect A repeated records) Act and subordinate statutes shall apply 1.

arrow