1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claim extended in the trial are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 31, 2013, the Plaintiff, who was admitted to the “C Council” (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), a hospital operated by the Defendant, was diagnosed by the Defendant with the trythrosis, and received a prescription from the Defendant for the treatment of the said tryrosis (hereinafter “the amount of the injection in this case”), and received the injection on the right side of the 5th page of the above tryrosis for treatment of the said tryrosis.

B. Around November 7, 2013, the Plaintiff, who was admitted to the Defendant Hospital, re-exposed the amount of injection in the instant case to the 2th century, which was the first half of the 2nd half of the 2013th half of the 2013th half of the 2013.

C. On November 19, 2013, the Plaintiff asserted that the amount of injection in the instant case was brought to a hospital, other than the Defendant Hospital, and that the 4th military room (hereinafter “the instant symptoms”) deemed to be the right side of the Plaintiff, due to the injection of the amount of injection in the instant case, was killed (hereinafter “the instant symptoms”). Accordingly, the said hospital was given a prescription for injection on the part of the instant warship in the instant hospital.

As of November 7, 2014, the Plaintiff is in the state where the symptoms of this case remain after being injected to the bend of the instant bend of the bend of the death.

E. The symptoms of boomed symptoms are one of the side effects caused by injection of the injection amount of the instant case. The symptoms of the instant case are the phenomenon where the strokes (strokes or strokes) were added to the strokes to the strokes, thereby suppressing the strokes that form the strokes or the strokes, thereby suppressing the strokes of the strokes.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 5, 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the result of the entrustment of the medical record to the President of the Korean Medical Association of the first instance court, the purport of

2. Determination on the claim for damages caused by negligence in medical treatment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the amount of injection in the instant case can be recorded with all the ties, organizations, and skin organizations, instead of melting only local communities where the amount of injection was spent as it is.