beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a member of the National Assembly, who obtained a doctorate as a thesis (hereinafter “C”) of the title “D” in the United States C (hereinafter “C”) around 193, and as a member of the National Assembly, the Plaintiff is a media company that published the Defendant Dong-dong (hereinafter “Defendant Dong-dong”) as a monthly newspaper, and Defendant Dong-dongcom (hereinafter “Defendant Dong-dongcom”) operates its Internet homepage (www.D Long.com) and publishes articles, etc. of the above “Dong-dong” on the Internet.
B. Defendant Dong Jae-sung published the [Attachment 2] article of “H” (hereinafter “the ground article of this case”) in E-dong F (L) and Defendant Dong Dong-a-com reported the [Attachment 3 article of “I” (hereinafter “the Internet article of this case”); and the combination of the above articles “H” (hereinafter “each article of this case”).
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, purport of the whole pleadings
2. The Plaintiff’s assertion did not plagiarism another thesis, and even if there were problems such as the omission of some sources in the thesis of this case, this is only limited to the literature and theoretical background, which can be said to be the most part of the thesis, and it does not relate to research results, discussions, and conclusion, which are the core area of the thesis. Thus, plagiarism cannot be deemed as plagiarism.
Nevertheless, since the defendants reported false facts that the thesis of this case was confirmed as plagiarism, the defendant East Asia has a duty to publish a correction report attached to the article of this case on the ground of the paper of this case, and defendant East Asia has a duty to delete the article of this case. The defendants are jointly obligated to jointly report the above false facts to the plaintiff and pay the plaintiff KRW 10 million as compensation for damages against the plaintiff's defamation.
3. The time limit for entry.