beta
Text
1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 44,109,376 and KRW 41,083,807.
Reasons
. In the case of other parts, such as columns and beams, construction is a example of building construction by structural drawings; construction was executed in the same manner as structural drawings; construction was executed in accordance with structural drawings; construction was conducted in a more large size than architectural drawings; construction was conducted in accordance with structural drawings; and construction of a wall is not clearly specified and material is insufficient; thus, it is difficult to recognize the non-construction of the wall as defects.
0. Among the contracts (supply) for cement brick-project alteration (supply) and completion drawings, which are not concrete retaining walls, the windows above the 5 to 8th floor above the south 28th floor of the building are designed differently from the H:100m H: 100m H: nB0m; nB0m H: The structure drawings are currently constructed the same as the construction finishing drawings; the structure drawings are constructed the same as the lower 500mh at the bottom; in general, in the case of major parts, such as columns and beams, the construction is conducted through construction based on the structural drawings, and the size of the beams indicated in the structural drawings is 500*200, the remainder appears to be a general finishing, not a concrete structure; and there is no clear specification as to the completed part concerned, it is difficult to conclude that there is no other evidence to conclude it as a defect as a cement brick, not a concrete retaining wall.
Although the defendant asserts that there is a defect that has been changed and constructed into cement brick rather than a concrete retaining wall in relation to the inner wall of 5-8 stories above the same side and north side, there is no evidence to acknowledge it.
0. 30 0.30 29 ... there is no evidence to prove that there is no reason to prove that the columns used towards the west by the c.m. when the 29 m. pole was constructed in a vertical line, the columns of the c.m. 0 m. 30 m. m. 0. 0. 31 m. THK65 m. 65 m. .... .... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... ...