The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The defendant does not have any misunderstanding of the face of D, and the court below erred by misapprehending the facts.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below in misunderstanding of facts, and in particular the witness D's statement in the court below, the facts that the defendant and D were engaged in game in the scambling in the scam room and had been scambling out of one another, the fact that D in the scambling part of the scambling part of the scambling part of the scambling part of the scambling part of the scambling part of the scambling part of the scambling part of the scambling part of the scambling part of the scam, the defendant also scambling part of D.

B. Although the Defendant agreed with the victim D of unreasonable sentencing, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed each of the instant fraud during the period of repeated crime, even though he/she was punished several times by imprisonment and fine due to the crime of fraud; (b) the injury to the fraud was not recovered; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct; (d) motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances that conditions for sentencing, such as the circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.