The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) has only been unilaterally against the victim, and there is no fact that the victim is walking the victim's right by standing against it.

2. The following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, i.e., the victim consistently committed assault from the Defendant from the investigative agency to the court of the lower court as stated in the facts charged:

F’s statement is also consistent with the above victim’s statement, and F’s statement was reported to the effect that “I ambling” was “I ambling” in the 112 report receipt status list.

The mere fact that the above statement is insufficient to dismiss the above statement, ② even if based on the statement of D reported to the police after witness a fighting and the police, the victim and the defendant were faced with a fighting and the defendant. ③ In full view of the fact that E, a police officer dispatched to the scene at the time, and E, a police officer at the time, and the fact that one person was unilaterally assaulted by the victim, other than the fact that there was a fighting from the telephone or on the spot, it can be sufficiently recognized the fact that the defendant used the victim during the dispute as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below.

The above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.