A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 11, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business: (a) at E main points operated by the victim D in 00:40 on May 11, 2016, for the reason that he had a lot of drinking values after drinking alcohol, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victimized person’s main points by force on the ground that he was shamping a boom, together with the bath theory that “the booms and booms hacks hackshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhn

2. The Defendant of assaulted F (33) of the Victim F (hereinafter referred to as “Is that would not interfere with other customers”) who is the main manager in charge of having received contact from the employee on the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, and at the place, that the customer f (333) went to the main place to arrive at the place.”

"Woo," and assaulted the victim's fingers by plucking, plucking, and booming the victim's fingers.

3. The Defendant insultd the victim by openly insulting the victim G, an employee of the above main point, such as “Calsty,” “one-year,” “one-year,” and “one-year death,” on the ground that the alcohol value had been unsured among the dates and places indicated in paragraph 1, and one other.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Each statement of H and D;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Two crimes, the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines, for which the basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person subject to special sentencing) is irrelevant to the category 1 (Obstruction of Duties) (the scope of recommended punishment) (the scope of duties).