logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.07.23 2015고단2102
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On March 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. to the Daegu District Court on June 12, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 2, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Fraud of opening a mobile phone;

A. On March 2014, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement that “The Defendant would pay a fee of KRW 600,000,000 to the victim B (year 24) by opening the 5S unit in the 5S unit.”

However, even if the defendant opens a mobile phone in the name of the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the fee to the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, had the victim establish one mobile phone 5S in the name of the victim, and caused the victim to pay the mobile phone charges and installments equivalent to 1.3 million won on behalf of the victim.

B. On March 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement to the victim B that “the Defendant would purchase 31 galgal lugian jus and pay the fee for the galgal jus by paying the fee for the galgal jus by using the same method as that of the preceding paragraph.”

However, even if the defendant opens a mobile phone in the name of the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the fee to the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, had the victim establish one cellular phone in the name of gallon in the name of the victim, and caused the victim to pay on behalf of the victim the telecommunication fee and installment equivalent to 2.3 million won.

2. On April 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated on April 2, 2014, 201, that “the Defendant was the victim B before the Daegu Seo-gu E Franck located in the Franc, Daegu-gu, that “the domestic license was suspended; (b) the Defendant would pay the rental car in the name of thener.”

However, even if the defendant gives a siren in the name of the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the cost.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and is in the name of the victim.

arrow