1. The Defendant’s KRW 21,335,850 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from October 1, 2013 to June 9, 2015.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the plaintiff is a company engaging in the manufacture and sale of the raw materials and components with the trade name "B", and the defendant is a personal business entity who manufactures the early clifing tools, etc. from June 2, 2012 to June 6, 2013; the plaintiff manufactured and supplied the defendant with the exchange clifing seals to the defendant from June 2, 2012 to June 6, 2013; the plaintiff agreed to pay the price of the goods within 90 days from the date of issuance of the tax invoice; the plaintiff issued a tax invoice with regard to the supply of the goods to the defendant on June 30, 2012, but the defendant paid only part of the purchase price, and the defendant paid the remaining purchase price of 35,49,350 won to the defendant, while the plaintiff is a person who returned the goods from the defendant.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 21,35,850 (i.e., KRW 35,449,350 - KRW 14,113,50) and damages for delay calculated at each rate of 20% per annum under the Commercial Act from Oct. 1, 2013 to Jun. 9, 2015, which is clear that the original copy of the instant payment order was served on the Defendant, as the date the original copy of the instant payment order was served, as sought by the Plaintiff, from Oct. 1, 2013 to Jun. 9, 2015.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.