The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that is engaged in gold-type production business with the trade name of “C” and the Defendant is a company that mainly engages in plastic-type production business.

JIG 1 sets of KRW 1,500,000, KRW 3,5000,000,000,000,000 for Sun Capital 7,50,000 for Sun Capital-OUT 1 sets of KRW 6,000,000, in total, KRW 3,500,000 for SIN IONB Badge 1 sets of KRW 3,500,00 for Sun Capital 3,50,000 for 3,50,000 for Sun Capital.

B. On May 22, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a gold production contract with the Defendant with the following content:

(However, in the instant case, the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not submit evidence to determine the accuracy of the penalty as follows, and specified the object on the basis of the name stated in the contract; hereinafter referred to as the “first contract”).

On June 15, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into an additional gold-making agreement with the Defendant on the production of gold-related type of KRW 20,000,00 (excluding value-added tax).

(2) Article 5(2) of the Act provides that the Plaintiff shall submit a sample approved to the Defendant and pass an inspection standard at the time of completion of the production of gold in the instant case (hereinafter “the second contract”). The date of completion of the production of gold in the instant case shall be 10 copies of sample sample, 10,000 won in cash within a week from the date of issuance of the tax invoice after the date of issuance of the tax invoice, and 8,000 won in cash within a week from the date of issuance of the tax invoice, 6,00,000 won in the intermediate payment, 6,000,000,000 won in the intermediate payment, and 8,000 won in cash from the date of issuance of the tax invoice, and 9,000 won in the case of delivery and payment as designated by the Defendant.