(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.11.26 2019고정606

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.11.26 2019고정606

폭행등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who operates the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government "C", and the victim D (n, 54 years old) operated real estate in the name of "E" at the same office located next to the same location, and the office of "E" around June 30, 2018 was determined as KRW 5 million and monthly rent of KRW 1 million and leased from the defendant.

1. Around 10:50 on January 7, 2019, the Defendant assaulted the victim by spreading water contained in the franc World Cup to the victim’s face while talking about the fact that the Defendant did not share the real estate intermediary goods with the victim, and about the unpaid part of monthly rent, “A bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a p

2. The Defendant interfered with business: (a) assaulted the victim at the time and place specified in paragraph (1); (b) carried the victim’s real estate office into the toilet passage; (c) carried the computer and books, etc. leased at the time of the contract; (d) made customers difficult to enter the office in front of the victim’s real estate office entrance; and (e) made the victim’s computer difficult to use the data relating to real estate brokerage stored in the computer.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's real estate brokerage business by force.

Recognizing that it is guilty of interference with business which permitted the change as a selective charge, there is no separate judgment on the charge prior to the change.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. The defendant's act of obstruction of business is based on the victim's implied consent, although the defendant's act of obstruction of business is based on the following evidence adopted by this court: a monthly agreement on real estate (office), monthly photographs of police officers' shooting site, photographs of victim's scene, and victim's presentation site pictures.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2021.01.28 2020고단5927

-서울남부지방법원 2012.11.13 2012고정1460

-대전지방법원 2015.08.27 2014고정1791

-의정부지방법원 2017.10.19 2016고정2603

-춘천지방법원 2016.11.24 2015노1128