logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.10.19 2016고정2603
업무방해
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the president of D (hereinafter “D”) who is a meeting of the certified intermediaries located in C, Nam-si, Nam-si, the Defendant, who is a member of F (hereinafter “F,”) which is a meeting of the certified intermediaries in C (hereinafter “D”). On May 2015, the Defendant attempted to transfer the office located in H to 101, an I apartment commercial building located in C, which is located in H, from the Republic of Korea, in order to prevent the transfer of the office of the female, and to interfere with the business of the female.

A. On May 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the J-authorized Brokerage Office operated by the Defendant, 103, the Defendant: (b) did not have the right to request F to withdraw the victim from F or not to open an office in C; (c) obtained the consent of D members to achieve this right; and (d) demanded F and D members, including F and D members, to call to the person in charge of the Internet site where they share information, such as sale and purchase, lease, etc. for real estate brokerage, to make it impossible for F members, such as the victim, etc., to view the information, such as brokerage, etc. of D members; and (d) obstructed the victim’s real estate brokerage business by blocking information sharing from May 1, 2015 to October 20 of the same year by force by preventing the victim from viewing the information related to real estate brokerage.

B. On May 11, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s real estate brokerage business by force by demanding that all members, including the victim, be unable to share information through the above K site at a restaurant of M with L, and that all members, including D members, can not share information through the above K site, and that the victim cannot act as a joint real estate intermediary with D members.

(c)

On November 5, 2015, the Defendant, at an O cafeteria located in N around November 5, 2015, provided D members and meals with D members, and the P real estate Q Q, which was mediated by the victim and the victim, to open an office in the C District, continues to do so through the said K site.

arrow