1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff installed a pipe on the said farmland in return for water in the aggregate of 5909 square meters of the land owned by the Plaintiff, and the Defendant, upon approval from D around 2014, damaged it without permission. The Defendant’s act of damaging the pipes owned by the Plaintiff constitutes a tort, and thus, is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages incurred therefrom. The amount of damages is ① KRW 10,000,000, and ② The amount of damages is 1,320,000,000, and KRW 1,320,00,000, and KRW 550,000, and KRW 20,870,000, and KRW 20,000, KRW 50,000, and KRW 20,000, KRW 30,000, KRW 50,000, and KRW 20,000, KRW 20,000, and KRW 50,005,05,00.

[The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff's 14,00,000 won (i.e., 200,000 won) equivalent to the market price (i., 80,000 won per horse) of 10 Madro-dried rice (i.e., 80 kilograms) each year, cultivated the above farmland owned by the plaintiff from March 1, 2007 to December 31, 2013 and the total of 14,00,000 won (i.e., 7 years x 10 x 200,000 won) and pipes were damaged so that rice can not be produced due to water cause due to water damage, the plaintiff's assertion that the above 40 Madro-dried rice (200,000 won per Madro) equivalent to 8,000,000 won (i.e., 200 x 200,00 won) or 600 Do pipe is the owner's.

It is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff interfered with the supply of water to the land owned by the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.