beta
Text
1. The defendant against the plaintiff A,
(a) collect trees planted in D 1,372 square meters at the time of inn, and deliver the said land.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
(a) The following facts may be admitted, either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the respective descriptions of evidence A Nos. 1, 2, and 3 and the purport of the entire pleadings:
1) The Defendant leased the Plaintiff’s 1,372 square meters of the answer 1,372 square meters from the Plaintiff to the end of April 30, 2014, 200: (a) 200 m2,000 m2,000 a.m. annual rent (a., 80 m.,00 m.); (b) from April 30, 2010 to April 30, 2014. The Defendant agreed to collect seedlings planted on the said land by the end of the contract, remove foreign objects, and recover them. (b) The Defendant leased the Plaintiff’s 1,380 m2 m2,000 m2,000 per annual rent (a., 80 m.,000 m., ma), from April 30, 2010 to April 30, 2014.
The defendant agreed to collect seedlings planted on the above land by the end of the contract and restore the above land to its original state by removing and molding them.
3) The Defendant each of the above lease agreements (hereinafter “each of the instant lease agreements”).
(3) Each of the lands on which seedlings were planted (hereinafter “each of the lands of this case”) even after the expiration of April 30, 2014, the expiration date of which was the expiration date.
(4) On January 30, 2015, the Plaintiffs notified the Defendant of the termination of each of the instant lease agreements, and the Defendant received the aforementioned notification at that time.
5) Meanwhile, under the premise that the collection of planted seedlings on each of the instant lands has been completed, the cost of restoring each of the instant lands to its original state is KRW 6,930,000 (including value-added tax).
B. According to the above facts, each of the instant lease agreements was renewed without setting a period under the same conditions after the expiration of the term, and its termination was terminated as of the date of the closing of argument in the instant case where it was apparent that six months have passed since the Defendant was notified of the termination on January 30, 2015 by the Plaintiffs.
C. Therefore, the defendant is as follows.