1. The plaintiff's primary claim shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant is not less than 8,037§³ in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

(a) Appendix 1. In the Schedule.

1. The facts falling under any of the following subparagraphs may be found either as a dispute between the parties or as a whole in the entries in Gap evidence 1 to 8, 12, 14 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 11 and 17, with the whole purport of the pleadings:

The Plaintiff is a company that constructed and sold A apartment 1 or 21 units on June 27, 2003 with the approval for establishment from the head of Seocho-gu on June 27, 2003 to promote a housing reconstruction project, the members of which consist of 1 or 19 units of A apartment on the ground of Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as “2-1 parcel of land”). The Plaintiff obtained the authorization for alteration of housing reconstruction on November 3, 2013, when it decided to re-building together with B large A apartment 20 units of land and 21 units of land (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”). The Plaintiff is a company that built A apartment 1 or 21 units of land.

B. The original land of Gangnam-gu Seoul, E, and F (hereinafter referred to as “land before rearrangement”) became the instant land on February 7, 1986, following the annexation and subdivision.

On June 16, 1976, the defendant acquired the ownership of the land before reorganization, concluded a sales contract with the first buyer on or around November 17, 1977, and completed the apartment of this case on the land before rearrangement. From March 21, 1978 to November 2, 1982, the defendant completed the registration of the ownership transfer of the apartment of this case, which is composed of 53 square meters (exclusive area 154.74 square meters) and 2,403 percent of the total land before rearrangement to the first buyer of this case, and completed the registration of ownership transfer of this part of this case at around the time.

However, the defendant left 28/2,413 of the remaining shares in the land before reorganization (hereinafter referred to as the "share in this case") in the name of the defendant, and also became the land in this case.

C. The enforcement of the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter referred to as the " Aggregate Buildings Act") on April 11, 1985 is September 1, 1986.