1. The plaintiff,

A. Of the main claims, the measures listed in Appendix 1 No. 1 and 3 through 7 are among the dispositions listed in Appendix 1.

Basic Facts

On November 4, 1954, the agreement between the Plaintiff and Uanan-gun, the Plaintiff, on the ground of Sungdong-ri 866,867, Sung-dong-dong, the Plaintiff owned by the Plaintiff, established a sediment Party under the Plaintiff’s control, and used the building as a sedi building by setting up the household building on the ground of the said land.

On October 1, 1957, the Plaintiff used part of the land 1033 of Sungdong-ri as the construction site for the construction site for the Yandong-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri (hereinafter “instant agreement”), between the Plaintiff and the Yan-ri-ri

(A) On January 10, 1960, the Plaintiff newly built a bridged building (hereinafter “instant building”) with a total floor area of 277.69 square meters on the land owned by the Plaintiff and on the ground of part of 1033 square meters on the land owned by the Plaintiff and registered on the building ledger on the same day. On June 3, 1982, the Plaintiff completed the preservation registration of the instant building and used the said building as a bridged building until now.

On September 6, 1991, the head of Sung-dong-ri 1033 divided the part of 174 square meters used as the site of the building of this case among the land of Sung-dong-ri 1033 on September 6, 1991, into the land of 103-4 square meters in the Dong-dong-dong-ri 103-4 (hereinafter “the land of this case”). The land of this case was abolished the designation of the road and the land category was changed to the religious site.

The Defendant’s disposition is an institution entrusted with the management of the instant land by the Republic of Korea pursuant to the State Property Act and subordinate statutes, and on the ground that the Plaintiff occupied and used the instant land without permission, the Defendant’s disposition from March 23, 2004 to March 2009, as indicated in the Disposition List No. 1, 2009.