logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.04.01 2016가단202456
구상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 67,079,754 and KRW 43,970,172 among the Plaintiff’s KRW 67,079,754, and KRW 23,109,582 among the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status 1) The Plaintiff is the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Insurance Act”).

(B) is a corporation that is entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor with the industrial accident compensation insurance business, and that is incorporated B (hereinafter “B”).

) The Hadi Food Agency in Chungcheong-gun C (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Corporation”) shall be the Corporation.

2) The Defendant (former D Co., Ltd.) is an insurer which has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to E and F vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicles”).

On the other hand, E is the wife of B representative director G.

B. On November 13, 2012, H, and I, an employee of the re-employed Party B, had been involved in the instant construction site and suspended work for the said worker, and had the Defendant’s vehicle driven by J (which was registered as a director in the B corporate register, and whose representative director’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

As a result, victims H suffered injuries, such as cage dul dul dul, dul dul dul, etc., and dul 1 suffered injuries such as double dul dul complex dul.

C. The victims of the Plaintiff’s industrial accident insurance benefits paid B as the insured, and the Plaintiff recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident under Article 5 of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act, and paid the victims of the instant accident KRW 39,65,210, medical care benefits of 18,409,040, disability benefits of 30,957,080, and KRW 15,104,370, temporary disability benefits of 29,704, and KRW 24,876,220, respectively, until January 22, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's entries in Gap's evidence Nos. 1.2, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 16 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence and scope of liability for damages;

A. According to the facts of the recognition of the first liability for damages, the instant case is deemed to have occurred.

arrow