1. The Defendants are jointly and severally and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 45,807,535 and KRW 5,593,975 among them, from July 1, 2014.

1. Basic facts are corporations that are entrusted with industrial accident compensation insurance business pursuant to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”).

The National Federation of Bus Transport Business Associations (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Federation”) is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile mutual aid agreement with the Defendant Company B (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Company”).

Defendant A is an employee of the Defendant Company.

D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “D”) leased the instant Lives from the Defendant Company to its employees for their commuting to and from work with Defendant A, who is a driver of the instant Lives.

At around 05:30 on January 3, 2014, Defendant A caused an accident that did not avoid an accident due to the violation of the duty of safe driving, while driving the instant coastal vehicle in the vicinity of the tunnel and tunnel near the Western Highway (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

As a result of the instant accident, the victim E, who was a DNA employee, who was on duty aboard the instant Maritime Vehicle and was on duty to work, suffered injuries, such as brain, acute climatic base, dysical base, dysical base, etc., and the victim F, who was on duty, suffered injuries to the victim, such as rashes, mathum, mathalum, mathalthum, mathalum, and alorum mathy,

Until July 3, 2014, the Plaintiff paid 148,248,460 won in total, including 440,200 medical care benefits and 17,93,520 won of temporary layoff benefits, and 18,433,720 won in total, and 14,025,130 won in medical care benefits, 45,446,530 won in temporary layoff benefits, and 88,776,80 won in disability benefits, respectively, until August 27, 2015.

[Grounds for Recognition: Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 through 5, and 7 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. The occurrence and scope of the Defendants’ liability for damages

A. According to the above recognition of the liability for damages, the Defendant Company provided the instant sea-going vehicle as a D’s employee’s commuting vehicle, and caused the Defendant A, one of its employees.