The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of three million won) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court determined that: (a) under the circumstances favorable to the Defendant’s confession and reflection of the instant crime; (b) the fact that there was no record of punishment for the same type of crime; (c) the act of lending the means of access requires strict measures, such as undermining the credibility of electronic financial transactions; and (d) taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details and circumstances of the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the sentence was determined by taking into account

Even when considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant as the grounds for appeal, the lower court appears to have determined the punishment within a reasonable scope, sufficiently taking into account all the circumstances regarding sentencing.

Furthermore, there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances to change the sentencing of the lower court after the lower judgment.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act because the defendant's appeal is without merit.