beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B Co., Ltd.: (a) indicated on the attached sheet 11,505 square meters among the 1,505 square meters of the land for the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City C Railroad.
Reasons
1. In fact, the following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by taking into account the following facts: Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3-1 to 4, Gap evidence 4, 5-1, 2, Gap evidence 6-1, 2, 3, Gap evidence 7-1 to 5, Gap evidence 8-1, 2, 3, and 9-1 to 8-5, Gap evidence 8-1, 8-2, 3, and Eul evidence 9, and the whole purport of the pleadings.
The land of Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City is 1,505 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the "land of this case") which is owned by the plaintiff and is in the lower part of the bridge for the ground section of Busan subway D.
B. On July 20, 2007, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement to lease 26 parcels of land, including E and the instant land, for the purpose of creating and operating a flower complex, etc. (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).
C. E established F Co., Ltd. F (hereinafter referred to as “F”), and accordingly, the lessee of the instant lease was changed to F on August 4, 2008.
Around April 14, 2011, Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant B”) purchased the ownership of the part (Ga) (Ga) located on the ground of 100 square meters of land attached to the instant land, which was connected in order to each point of 11,12,15,16, 11 of the attached Table No. 11 among the instant land, and entered into a contract for the use of the part (Ga) located on the ground of 100 square meters of land attached to the instant land (hereinafter referred to as the “part (Ga) and the attached Table No. 12,13,14,15, and 12 of the land attached to the attached Table No. 100 square meters of land.
E. Defendant A, as the father of G, the representative director of Defendant B, has occupied the part (a) land and the part (b) land while managing the instant facilities.
F. F, as F did not pay long-term rents, the Plaintiff terminated the instant lease agreement on July 18, 2012.
(g) The amount equivalent to the rent for a section (a) land and a section (b) land;