A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 13, 2015, the Defendant used the name “D” to the victim C at the fourth floor office of the Seo-gu Daejeon Special Metropolitan City Seo-gu Daejeon Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) on April 13, 2015, and made a false statement to the effect that “I will have a child of the Party and his/her husband employed to work as his/her husband and wife at the E University administrative office, if I wish to do so.”

However, the defendant thought that he will use the above money for his personal purpose, and there was no intention or ability to allow the victim's children and his dependants to find employment in the E University.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received cash of KRW 10 million from the victim on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On April 14, 2015, around April 14, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement that “Around April 14, 2015, the Defendant had a curios with the victim in the above office “at present, there is a curios of the Cheongju-si in China. It is necessary to KRW 30 million with the appraisal cost of the Cheongju-si in this office. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 30 million, the Defendant would have sold and paid the money immediately after appraising the Cheongju-si.”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that most of the above 30 million won were used for personal purposes, and the value of the above 30 million won was not confirmed, and there was no person to purchase it, and there was no intention or ability to repay the debt to the defendant, since there was no specific property.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was issued KRW 30 million to the victim’s cashier’s checks on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

3. Around June 1, 2015, the Defendant called the victim on or before June 1, 2015, and called “around June 1, 2015, the Defendant was taking advantage of the victim’s phone to work in the administrative office of the E University, with his/her own children and his/her children employed in the administrative office of the E University, and the labor union’s side of the university is serious. As such, the Defendant said that the Defendant would transfer KRW 2 million as he/she requires money

However, in fact, the defendant does not use the above money in relation to the labor union of a university, and is an individual.