logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.01.18 2017고정1037
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 7, 2017, around 13:19, the Defendant: (a) committed theft with the victim E (n.e., 27 years old) and with the creshing of “D hotel” in Busan Shipping Daegu C, using any cresh in around the atmosphere; and (b) committed theft with the 6S smartphone market value of KRW 90,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.

2. The Defendant was found to have found in a wedding hall with the denied F in any way.

Along with the fact that he did not receive food, or who did not provide meals on a restaurant due to a large number of people in the restaurant, he/she conspireds to acquire a waste, a meal right, or cash by deceiving the recipient of the congratulatory money.

On May 21, 2017, around 14:07, the Defendant had not received the right of meals from the victim J, a family member of the New Franc I, at the first basement G G G G in Busan, and at the same time, from the victim J, a family member of the new Franc I.

Liquor tax shall be required for food tickets.

“.......... ...... ....... ........ ............

However, there was no relation with the victim J and there was no fact that the defendant delivered congratulatory money.

As above, the defendant deceiving the victim and delivered it to F by receiving five copies of a public-private partnership right equivalent to KRW 33,00 from the injured party, and the F shows five copies of a public-private partnership right to the land purchase, while the F shows five copies of a public-private partnership right to the land purchase, and the F failed to provide meals because there are many people.

capital change required for liquor tax payment.

“A person who received KRW 50,00 in cash by making a false statement.”

As a result, the defendant and the F conspireds the victim, thereby deceiving the victim with the amount of KRW 50,00 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of E and J;

1. Investigation report (in relation to the analysis of CCTVs at the scene of occurrence);

1. Investigation report (the mobile phone of victim E);

1. Investigation report (related to the analysis of CCTVs in Hweing systems) and the application of statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of fines

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.

arrow