A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 22, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for obstructing the performance of special official duties by the Incheon District Court, and on September 11, 2016, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the third intersection of the North Korean Peninsula.

On October 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 00:53 on October 30, 2016, and (b) around 00:57 on the same day, “I wish to voluntarily surrenders.”

A person was killed.

around 01:02 on the same day, “A person who died in the house” and “a person who died in the house” around 01:14 on the same day.

The knife reported 112 falsely on four occasions a total of the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention and investigation of crimes by deceptive means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. 112 Statement of reported case processing, and detailed statement of reported case processing; and

1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation reports (reports attached to the judgments of the same kind as the suspect A), and application of the statutes attached thereto;

1. Relevant Article 137 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. Sentencing criteria: Class 2 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties by Fraudulent Means) in the aggravated area (one year to 3 years), (special aggravation), and the same type of repeated crime;

2. The crime of this case is committed several times by making a false report, making a false report, making a false report, making a person killed, making a police officer take out unnecessary mobilization, and the quality of the crime is not good.

The defendant's act is not only a crime of waste of police power, but also a crime that threatens the safety of a good majority of citizens by making it impossible for police to respond promptly when there is a report of an important case.

The defendant commits a crime interfering with the performance of official duties in the same kind.