logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2012.06.08 2011고단188 (1)
사기 등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

The defendant is an applicant for compensation, who is an applicant for compensation, with the amount of KRW 15 million.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2011 Highest 188"

1. On July 27, 2010, the Defendant: (a) entered into an agreement with the Defendant and the victim D to jointly operate the said building by bearing 50% of the bid deposit at the G hotel coffee shop located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Gangnam-gu, Seoul Metropolitan District Court H; and (b) received KRW 6,184,00,00, out of the bid deposit, from the victim; (c) the Defendant also filed a bid report with the auction court by depositing a total of KRW 131,840,00 in the name of the J, but failed to perform the auction and kept the said bid deposit.

On August 27, 2010, the Defendant, while keeping the said money, delivered the said money to L, a representative director of K, “K” under the pretext of a loan, and embezzled an amount equivalent to KRW 6,184,00.

2. The Defendant had no monthly income, and had no particular property, and had been recorded as a bad credit holder, and even though L had a claim on the said L, it was difficult to recover the claim due to the continuous repayment of the claim. Therefore, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim C who became aware of through D, it did not have an intent or ability to repay the claim.

Nevertheless, around August 13, 2010, the Defendant delivered to the victim the statement to the effect that “if any money has been paid, the Defendant borrowed money” to the victim through N near Yongsan-gu Office, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and received KRW 15 million from the victim on the same day from the victim, and received KRW 5 million in total from the victim, such as remittance of KRW 5 million to the above account around August 19, 2010.

On August 10, 2010, the Defendant of the Gangnam-gu Seoul High Court Decision 2011J 256, the Defendant leased the Defendant’s “in-house call architecture to the Victim P at a coffee shop where the trade name of the nearest office of the Bank of Korea located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul High Court is unknown.” The Defendant leased the customer goods storage in the call architecture.

arrow