1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was sentenced to life imprisonment due to murder, etc. and was confined to B prisons.

B. On February 3, 2016, the Plaintiff sent to C, the head of the immediately preceding B prison, “AB prison, as a prisoner of the correctional institution, carried narcotics (copon) into the correctional institution on or around December 31, 2014, which was the cleaning unit, and administered to the correctional institution, the Plaintiff reported it to E on or around December 31, 2014 and January 24, 2015, but did not process E; and ② the Plaintiff told F and G, the prisoner of whom were the prisoner, was wraped on November 30, 2015, and thus, the Plaintiff demanded review of treatment, etc. against the Plaintiff.”

C. On February 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) investigated the facts upon delivery of the said letter; and (b) investigated the fact on February 24, 2016, the part of the letter that: (c) imported narcotics into the prison and administered them, and received a report by E; and (d) reported it; (b) the Plaintiff’s reporting act constitutes a case where the Plaintiff’s reporting act was punished by the said D or E, or reported false facts with the intent to interfere with the correctional officer’s performance of duties; (c) the Plaintiff demanded disciplinary resolution on the ground that he/she owns an unpermitted product, such as a gambling tape, paper shopping bags; and (d) the Disciplinary Committee, on February 25, 2016, notified the Plaintiff of the aforementioned disposition on the same day; (e) Article 107 subparag. 1 and 5 of the Administration and Treatment of Correctional Institution Inmates Act; and (e) Article 214 subparag. 15 and 17 of the Enforcement Rule of the Punishment Act; and (e) the Defendant notified the same day.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, entry in Gap’s Evidence Nos. 1, 3, 5, and 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was true, and the Plaintiff had possession and use of household goods, office goods, etc. with permission from the Defendant, and there is no reason to dispose of them.

The defendant is true in accordance with the Protection of Specific Crime Informants, etc. Act.