A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 30, 2016, at around 00:10, the Defendant 112 reported the “C convenience store” in front of the “C convenience store” located at the Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and respondeded to the horses that “undertakes alcohol,” from the slope E belonging to the Kimpo-gu Police Station Down, the Defendant sent to the site after having received a report from the convenience store that they frighted the fright at the convenience store.” The Defendant assaulted the above E’s vessel once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (a person who has no criminal record of confession, reflectivity, the previous record, or the suspended sentence or any contingent crime in the state of master acquisition);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;