Seoul Administrative Court 201Guhap10645 (Law No. 23, 2011)

Cho High Court Decision 2010Du2271 ( December 30, 2010)

Activities of substantial managers, etc. by appropriating the corporation's funds shall constitute the outflow of the company due to its expenditure.

(1) The act of a representative director, etc., who is the actual manager of a corporation, uses the corporation's funds for the purpose of using the corporation's funds is not done on the basis of the initial collection unless there are special circumstances, and thus the payment itself constitutes the outflow of the corporation, and the disposition of taxation is legitimate.

2011Nu39624 Revocation of Disposition of Corporate Tax Imposition

XX Co., Ltd

Head of Seocho Tax Office

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2011Guhap10645 decided September 23, 2011

April 18, 2012

May 23, 2012

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The defendant's notification of change in income amount of 000 won in 2004, income amount of 0000 won in 2005, and income amount of 000 won in 2006 for the plaintiff on March 22, 2010 shall be revoked.

The reasons for the judgment of this court are the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance that reads that the term 'Mala' that will be less than 3, 4, and 'MalaB' that will be considered 'MalaA' that will be 7, 4, and 6, as 'MalaCC'. The judgment of the court of first instance will be cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The judgment of the first instance is justifiable. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.