The accused shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment of innocence against the accused.

1. A factory laboratory;

Ⅰ In light of the background of the case, “LH (Korea Land and Housing Corporation)” entered into a project agreement with “D consortium” around 2008 and carried out the “J” project equivalent to the total project cost of KRW 5.33.1 billion, including the complex site (F, G) and the central commercial site (H and I) in the Sungnam E Special Planning Zone. The above consortium consisting of 13 companies, as the instant strategic investors, was 3% equity investment in the instant “K Private Teaching Institutes (L)” under the “Basic Convention for Private Institutes”, and continued to carry out the project including the purchase and operation of facilities, such as the private school foundation, education and cultural center, business facilities, and medical facilities.

In relation to the above J projects, K private teaching institutes, etc. may dispose of only after the completion of the J building and the completion of the transfer of the registration to the priority negotiating right holder such as K private teaching institutes, and if two or more persons purchase the investment funds in advance, the investment funds can be immediately invalidated in accordance with the understanding with the management agreement with the management decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision

On the other hand, the Defendant, around April 2010, in relation to “F, G, and N block” (representative P) strategic investors of the said J “F, G, and N block, caused the problem by inviting investors related to sale in advance who were prohibited by law and contract as above, and ultimately, it was clearly known that the said “O” was prohibited from soliciting investment by exercising the right to sell in advance in the process of withdrawing from the said business around 2011.

Nevertheless, the Defendant around August 2013, as a person in charge of J affairs of the above “O” by R, the Defendant is a person in charge of J affairs of the K Institute.