A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The defendant shall obtain money from the applicant D to the applicant for compensation 2.29 million won, and the applicant N.

Punishment of the crime

On November 6, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court, and on April 29, 2016, the parole period was expired on July 9, 2016 during the execution of the sentence in the Seoul Eastern Detention House. On February 3, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment for the same crime in the Suwon District Court Sejong District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated in the resident prison on October 17, 2017.

around October 30, 2017, the Defendant posted a letter stating that “The mobile phone is sold” by accessing the Internet website at the Defendant’s house located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government P, and that “The mobile phone is sent to Qua who reported and contacted the above letter, I will send 10,000 won to 74 cellphones.”

However, due to the fact that the defendant did not have the above mobile phone, even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above mobile phone.

Nevertheless, from October 30, 2017 to November 6, 2017, the Defendant received a total of KRW 17,620,000 from the 18 victims, including a total of KRW 17,620,00 from the 18 victims, including a transfer of KRW 1,10,000 to the bank account (S) in the name of the Korean bank in the name of the limited company (S). From that time to November 22, 2017, the Defendant received a total of KRW 17,620,00 from the 18 victims, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive property.

around November 5, 2017, the Defendant posted a letter stating that “a mobile phone is sold” by accessing the Defendant’s house or the Internet “hyromarket” site at the Defendant’s house or the neighboring room located in Seoul Central-gu P, Jung-gu P, and that “a mobile phone is sent to the victim T who reported and contacted the above letter “4 million won in the face of the remittance year.”

However, due to the fact that the defendant did not have the above mobile phone, even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above mobile phone.

Nevertheless, the defendant is guilty.