logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.04.17 2017고단1477
사기
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant A] On April 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) access to the Internet “Internet” site on the bulletin board of the place where he/she is located in the G in Busan Jin-gu, Busan, on April 17, 2017; and (b) Dogal ju S6 disposition on the bulletin board of the place.

“The gallon jums 60,000 won is sold to the victim E who reported and contacted the gallon.”

However, the defendant did not have S6 smartphones at the time and did not have any intent or ability to send such smartphones even if he did not receive money from the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 120,000 won from the Defendant’s Dong-in Busan Bank Account (I) in the name of the Defendant’s birth on the same day from the victim, and received 380,000 won in total from around that time to April 29, 2017, as shown in attached Table 1, from the victim 4 to April 2017.

[Defendants] 2017 Highest 1925 [Defendants]

1. The Defendants, J, and K, together with their friendship J and K, posted a false letter of sale on the Internet trading site, and received the price by fraud. Defendant B posted a false letter of sale on the above website, Defendant A took charge of the role of withdrawing money transferred from victims, and the above J provided a single bank account (L) and provided a mobile phone contact with the victims.

On April 9, 2017, in collusion with the above J and K, the Defendants sold S6 mobile phones at galtho-market (htps:/www. / www. Hllomet.com)” on the part of “N” located in Busan Northern-gu, Busan, the Defendants sold S6 mobile phones at galtho-market (htps:/www.hllom.com). The Defendants sent a notice to the victim who reported and contacted the notice, and deposited KRW 150,000 to the victimO who reported and contacted the notice, and sent the relevant goods on their own.

However, the facts did not have the intention or ability to send the said article even if they receive money from the injured party.

Defendants are said J and K.

arrow