logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.01.20 2016고정137
업무방해
Text

The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended separately.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants conspired to interfere with the construction work of the above ready-mixed factory with neighboring I, J, K, L, and M, as neighboring residents of the site of the construction work of the H's factory of the victim of the former Ham-gun G G in Pyeongtaek-gun, Inc.

1. On May 22, 2015, Defendants (Defendant B, E, A, and C) conspired to interfere with the construction of the above ready-mixed factory with residents in the name of around 10:30 to 11:00 on May 22, 2015, and entered the construction site of the above construction site for the purpose of obstructing the progress of construction with those who are not in the name of the Defendant C and the name of the Defendant C were seated above the wheels of the track, and the other non-named residents are seated above the seat of the track, and the other non-named residents of the Defendant A, B, and E are seated above the buck box, and the Defendant A, B, and E cannot be carried out with other non-named residents, thereby hindering the victim’s factory construction by force.

2. On May 28, 2015, the Defendant conspiredd to interfere with the construction work of the above ready-mixed factory with several named residents from around 13:00 to 15:00 on May 28, 2015, and conspired to interfere with the construction work of the above ready-mixed factory from around 13:0 to around 15:00, and entered the above construction site for the purpose of interfering with the progress of the construction work together with the aforementioned nameless boxes, and the victim sitd together with the above nameless boxes to prevent access to materials, vehicles, construction equipment, etc. at the construction site and interfered with the construction work of the victim’s factory by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of the witness N orO;

1. Documents reply, investigation report (request reply for investigation cooperation), investigation report (in the case of the victim's submission on May 28, June 1), investigation report (in the case of security and seizure of information), investigation report (in the case of the suspect E-project site), investigation report (in the case of correction of the suspect), investigation report (in the case of the suspect E project site, accompanying screen pictures and closure photographs), investigation report (in the case of the suspect E project site), investigation report (in the case of the suspect C project interference, screen image).

arrow