1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, fifty thousand won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 2009, the Defendant forged a private document, at the D Attorney-at-law office located in the city where it was no more than 50 million won, the Defendant made the F-name confirmation letter to the effect that “A (the Defendant) was unable to bring an disturbance due to the following: (a) the Defendant sent off the door door of the house of A (the Defendant) at around 10 April 20, 2006, and caused the Defendant to go against the disturbance, such as avoiding disturbance and killing 500 million won.”

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a letter of confirmation in the name of F, a private document related to the certification of facts.

2. On December 15, 2010, the Defendant submitted a written complaint against the employee of the above public service center, who is aware of the forgery, to the employee of the public service center, for the suspicion of defamation, at the public service center of Mapo-si, Yongsan-gu, Busan-si, Busan-si, and exercised the document as if it was a document duly formed with a forged certificate attached thereto.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to confirmations and investigation reports (a copy of confirmation in the F name);

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;