Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) filed an application for reexamination with the Seoul Central Labor Relations Commission (No. 2013, No. 2013, No. 184) due to wage delay, etc.; (b) received a written confirmation from the employees of the Company that the Defendant visited the restaurant in the name of the neighboring restaurant proprietor, in which the employees of the Company were frequently taking meals, to be recognized as the employees of the Company C, and submitted it.

On February 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) written a written confirmation to the effect that “I am-I am-I am-I am-I am-I am-I am-I am-I am-I am-I am I am-I am I am-I am-I am-I am- I am I am- I am I am- I am I am am I am I am

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a letter of confirmation in G name, which is a private document concerning rights and duties without authority, and around that time, submitted a forged document to a public official whose name the Seoul Central Labor Relations Commission’s name is unknown, and exercised it as if the document was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Each written statement of complaint and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (teleline investigation), investigation reports (date of the presentation of a falsified document, etc.);

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;