logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.02.18 2018고단7199
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Attached No. 1 (Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office 2018No. 6472).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, as the operator of the "C" game room in Eunpyeong-gu and the second floor in Seoul, operated the above game room by employing an employee D who is a representative in the name of the above game room, who manages the customers, as a representative in the name of the above game room, employee E who is in charge of the management of the customers, cleaning, and scambling in the above game room, employee F who is in charge of the management of the customers in the above game room, employee F who is in charge of the settlement of accounts, the management of sales, the management of the customers, the employees G who are in the heart of the above game room, as a night manager in the above game room, an employee H who makes settlement at night, the management of sales, the management of the customers, the employees I who are in the heart of the customers, and employees who exchange the game points of the customers in cash as an exchange of money in the above game room, and operated the above game room.

No one shall money or arrange for money exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of a game product, and no game products related business entity shall allow others to engage in gambling or other speculative acts or leave them to do so through the use of a game product.

From February 8, 2018 to March 22, 2018, the Defendant, along with D, E, F, G, H, I, and J, set up 50 game software, which was rated as a whole by “C” and operated a game site, and deducted 10% of the game fee per 10,000 won per cash from the stairs of the first floor after the game site at every hour and exchanged 9,000 won to customers.

As a result, in collusion with D, E, F, G, H, I, and J, the Defendant used game products to exchange tangible and intangible results acquired by customers through the use of game products, and let customers do gambling and other speculative acts using game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement 1.

arrow