beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a substantial operator of the indoor decoration construction business chain, and Defendant B is a person who was a representative in the name of the above company.
On March 19, 2013, the Defendants registered the “E” under Defendant B’s name, and Defendant A took charge of the construction site, and Defendant B took charge of the management of the company website, business advertisement, etc.
Defendant
B established a B B B B B B on the above company portal site, posted the indoor interior interior interior interior interior interior photography photographs constructed and completed by another company on the B’s “E” as if they were constructed in the “E”, and led the people who sought a construction contract to enter into a contract by presenting a low construction amount in comparison with other companies.
Defendant
On the other hand, A conspired with the Defendant B to receive the construction cost by intentionally delaying construction work after the conclusion of the construction contract and receiving a part of the construction cost, causing disputes with the construction contractor, or by failing to return the construction cost already received, due to business losses prior to the scheduled date of commencement, the higher-level construction contractor who completed the construction contract voluntarily renounces the contract and entrusts the construction work to another place.
1. On April 12, 2013, the building construction contract was concluded on the condition that the victim F and Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Construction Work for Madice Madice Madice Madice Madice Ga was completed by April 12, 2013, starting with the construction work and completed until April 30, 2013.
However, even if the above contents of the construction contract were to be concluded, the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to normally complete the construction contract within the prescribed period, and only about 10% of the total construction works, including removal and interior floor construction, were proceeded by the scheduled date
Accordingly, the victim F was notified on May 28, 2013 of the termination of the contract.
Defendants are as above.