A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 13, 2016, the Defendant, at around 21:47, the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building A, “E” office in the “FUE” office in 1211, shall connect the victim F to the page of the “FUE” office, “htp” which is the social network service of the Internet shock (htp:/www. /w.f.ok.com) and shall ensure that the victim F is able to obtain after deducting the information from the victim, and that the number of the elbows and the rears of the MUE will be cut to any extent far.

F President Don Don Don Don Don

G The President of the National Treasury of the Republic of Korea:

역시 두 분은 전문가들!!!” 라는 글을 게시하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

The Defendant posted a statement on the same day, such as a list of crimes, on the face of the Republic of Korea, thereby openly insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Sponsing the comments written by the victim, the data on the account of the suspect (the defendant and his defense counsel shall not constitute insulting expressions of the contents of the comments posted by the defendant;

The argument is asserted.

However, the insult as referred to in the crime of insult is not a statement of fact but an abstract judgment or a sacrific sentiment that may undermine the social evaluation of a person (see Supreme Court Decision 2003Do3972, Nov. 28, 2003, etc.). The expressions, such as, inter alia, “profesing experts,” “nickness,” “nicking experts,” “nicking people,” and “nicking people,” etc., posted by the Defendant, should be deemed to be an insulting speech that may damage the social evaluation of the victim, and the above assertion is without merit).

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.