logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.04.17 2017고단1256
모욕
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who uses SNS “C” as the clinic.

On June 29, 2017, the Defendant was a female-friendly member of the Victim F (21 years old, South, and North Korea) by accessing the Chuncheon apartment in around 16:00 residence, and using his own smartphone (E) in around 904 303 dong 303, and having access to the “ Peston North Korea”, and was a female-friendly member of the Victim F (21 years old, South, and North Korea University’s department and university leave).

H There is a refusal to take part in I’s “Pins North Korea” on the ground that the parties have discussed and responded to what he has written in his “Pins North Korea” the content of criticisming the victim by specifying (school, academic society, name) (including that the male-child job victim has left only dial partnership with dial-a-related partnership).

Along with § 22(d) a man’s shot, good, and love with a man’s shot, and a woman’s shot, who is the victim, appears to be equal equally, and publicly insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A written complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the screen of each glare (Evidence Nos. 3 through 6);

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine not exceeding 200,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence [1. This article is related to the victim and the person who posted his/her original text with the victim, and the victim is clearly identified in the name of the school, academic society and society.

The Defendant posted comments on the comments as indicated in its reasoning, and used the shot language, such as “vii f.g.,” (the Defendant also acknowledges the expression of illness, and the victim is also aware of it) and “maliba,” such as “mali”.

The contents of the above reproduced writing are only victims and the other women, and the contents of the comments are in the form of opinions.

arrow