The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

The defendant above.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, as the Defendant went to the game head of the game of this case to work in the game of this case on the day of this case and served about 30 minutes after getting assigned to work in the game of this case, and thus, the Defendant was not guilty of aiding and abetting the Defendant.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. On June 26, 2015, the Defendant, while working as an employee in the game room of the name of the Daejeon Peong-gu G and the third floor of the Daejeon Peong-gu, the Defendant: (a) opened the 60 game machine of the “ bilateral lecture” game classified by the Water Management Committee; and (b) opened the said “highly new game product” with the “highly new game product,” which was not classified by the said Committee; (c) provided the said “highly new game product to unspecified customers for use; and (d) exchanged and exchanged it according to the gains to perform speculative activities; and (d) provided the said A with the knowledge of the fact that he/she performed the said speculative activities, by facilitating the said A’s speculative activities, such as coffee and tobacco heart, food orders, etc., by engaging in the said business.

B. The lower court’s judgment acknowledged the interview to work as an employee, but there was no fact that he was subject to control prior to the commission of the act and actually participated in the crime.

“With respect to the Defendant’s prosecution, the content of the Defendant’s prosecutorial statement is not inconsistent with the present prosecutorial statement, the content of the A’s prosecutorial statement is consistent with the Defendant’s prosecutorial defense, and the Defendant was acquitted on the grounds that there is no other evidence to prove the facts charged.

(c)

The following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s judgment and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the first instance court, namely, ① employees of the game of this case mainly engaged in coffee or tobacco straw, etc. of customers. The Defendant worked in the game of this case around 09:00 on the day of this case.