Seoul Administrative Court 201Guhap2101 ( October 28, 2011)

Since the seizure of real estate was cancelled, there is no legal interest.

Since the seizure of each real estate of this case was cancelled, there is no legal interest in seeking confirmation that the disposition of this case is null and void.

2011Nu16751 Nullification of attachment disposition

AAAAAA

head of Sung Dong Tax Office

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2011Guhap2101 Decided April 28, 2011

August 10, 2011

September 21, 2011

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

1. Purport of claim

It is confirmed that each attachment disposition issued by the Defendant on March 16, 2009 with respect to each real estate listed in the Schedule 1 to 4 attached hereto is invalid.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

1. cite the judgment of the first instance;

In this case, the part of the "disposition" is the same as the judgment of the court of first instance, and this part is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Ex officio determination

According to the statement in Eul evidence No. 4, and the defendant may recognize the fact that the seizure of each of the instant real estate was cancelled on July 28, 201, after the appeal of this case. Accordingly, the plaintiff has no legal interest in seeking confirmation that the instant disposition is null and void.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is revoked, and the lawsuit of this case is dismissed. The total cost of the lawsuit is assessed against the defendant by applying Article 32 of the Administrative Litigation Act mutatis mutandis.