The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Since the misunderstanding of the substance of the grounds for appeal or the misunderstanding of the legal principles have not been exceeded, and the situation has been destroyed by the death of a good condition among the business operators, the purchase and sale of the goods to be traded by the death of a person who died from the supposer is not intentionally deceiving the consumers.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below on the argument of misunderstanding the facts of sentencing or misunderstanding of the legal principles, as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment below, as long as the defendant sold general destroyed goods purchased from a scoper, and the Internet shopping mall "the most old scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scop

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

The following facts may be taken into account: (a) the Defendant’s alternative time to commit a crime; (b) the volume of destruction of death and damage sold by advertising differently from the fact; and (c) the fact that the Defendant’s economic difficulty is not well-grounded; or (d) the Defendant’s purchase of high-quality general wear and tear at KRW 70,000 (1.5km); (b) the Defendant’s purchase of high-quality general wear and tear at KRW 75,00 (1.5km); and (c) the Defendant’s false advertisement of high-quality wear and teared so as to sell KRW 25-30,00 won per 1 km; (d) the Defendant committed a crime by impairing the practice of the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means, means, and result of the crime.