The defendant shall be innocent.

The summary of the facts charged is the person who operates three main points.

Around June 6, 2012, the Defendant provided a 5th week and a 5th week and a 1st week and a 5th week and a 5th week and a 18th week and a 5th week and a 5th week and a 5th week and a 18th week and a 5th week and a 5th week and a 5th week and a 18th week and a 5th week and a 5th week and a 5th week and a 5th week, respectively.

However, the defendant is the employee G of the defendant, not the defendant, that he had access to the juvenile, and provided liquor to the juvenile at the time in this court, and the defendant argued that he had never been able to become the juvenile at that time.

As to the above argument, the witness D testified that a person who received an order of alcohol and alcohol at the time of the instant case and brought food to the defendant, but the witness E, one of the parties, received an order and brought alcohol and alcohol to the police officer, and the defendant later stated that he was entered the room within the main place. The witness F, who received an order of the main place, made a statement that he brought alcohol and alcohol to the defendant. The witness F, who received an order of the main place, made a statement that he brought alcohol and alcohol to the defendant, does not coincide with each other.

In the absence of any investigation as to who instructed him to the room of the above main office at the time of the police investigation and provided alcohol and alcohol, there is a question as to who was first asked about about four months from the above case to the person who provided alcohol and alcohol in this court at the time of the above investigation. It is questionable as to who is properly memory at the time of the case.

On the other hand, the witness G, who was an employee, had three persons, such as D, entered the above main points in this court, ask them about what school is, thereby bringing the student to alcohol and food upon receiving the order.