beta
Text
Defendant
A, in six months of imprisonment, Defendant B Co., Ltd. shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,00,000, and Defendant C and C shall be punished by a fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A Of the “E Expansion and Functions Reinforcement Works” performed by B as the representative director of the Company B, a safety and health management manager who is obligated to perform safety and health measures for its employees by subcontracting the structure reinforcement work. Defendant C is a director of the site site of D Co., Ltd. who is responsible for the above “E Expansion and Functions Reinforcement Work” and the safety and health management manager for the prevention of industrial accidents of workers and workers belonging to the relevant employees and contractors. Defendant B Co., Ltd is a corporation for the purpose of metal creative construction work, etc., and Defendant D is a contracting business owner as a corporation for construction business, etc.
1. The defendant A’s business owner shall, when he/she works in a place, etc. where any worker is at risk of falling or falling down, install a work board by means of assembling the vision, etc., and shall not allow the worker to use the machinery, tools, equipment, water tools, etc. for any purpose other than those at the time of manufacturing, etc., have the duty of care to prevent the
Nevertheless, at around 16:50 on May 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was in the second floor G 2 in Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon; (b) was negligent in performing occupational duties; (c) was engaged in the work of removing sludges at a height of 2 meters, and did not install a work board by assembling a dog to prevent fall; and (d) was engaged in the work using a mobile-type mobile-type bridge as a work board by using the victim H (42 years old); (c) fell from the above mobile-type bridge and caused the victim to die from the above mobile-type bridge; and (d) around 07:30 on June 2, 2016, at the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, a 100-lane International Stol University International Embro Hospital.
As a result, the Defendant did not take necessary measures to prevent the danger at a place where a worker is at risk of falling during work, and at the same time, died of the victim by negligence on duty.