Incheon District Court 2014Na55482

Incheon District Court 2014Gadan12781

(D) Whether the person is a principal tenant or not

(In the Housing Lease Protection Act, the opposing power provided for in Article 3 (1) of the Housing Lease Protection Act is not acquired, and even if the opposing power is satisfied, a lease contract is concluded to abuse the Housing Lease Protection Act to protect the small lessee, and thus it is not a small lessee under the Housing Lease Protection Act.

The opposing power, etc. under Article 3 of the Housing Lease Protection Act and the protection of a specified amount among the deposit;

2015Da240058 Demurrer, etc. against distribution

KimA

1. BB companies, 2. The Republic of Korea 3. The JCC

Incheon District Court 2014Na55482 (Law No. 17, 2015.17)

oly 14, 2016

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

The records of this case and the judgment below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are examined.

The argument regarding the appeal is clearly without merit because it falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.