1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The reasoning for this case is as follows, and the court's acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, and this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The term "batch" in the 5th sentence of the first instance court shall be deleted.

Each "Appraiser" in the 6th, 7th, and 8th, 12th, 6th, 6th, 7th, and 8th, shall be respectively dismissed.

In the 7th judgment of the first instance court, "from the fact of recognition" is deemed to be "the whole purport of the evidence evidences presented in the first instance court or it is deemed to be "from the first instance court's judgment."

On the 8th 10th 10th 1 of the judgment of the first instance court, “I do not exist,” and the defendant argues that the service cost cannot be paid as the result of the basic design work performance supplied by the plaintiff was delayed due to the failure of the ordering agency to obtain the approval of the ordering agency, and the contract is terminated from the ordering agency. However, the entry in the 3th 3th 3th 2th 2th 2th 2th 1st 2th 1st 1st 201 in light of the appraisal result of the first instance appraiser A and all the above circumstances, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.”

In Part 10 of the decision of the court of first instance, "no reason exists" is added to "In addition, it is reasonable to view that the starting point of the extinctive prescription of a bond for a designer's construction (Article 163 subparagraph 3 of the Civil Act) shall be calculated from the time of termination, such as the contract price for payment of individual down payment or progress payment before the expiration of the contract."

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.