logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.07.11 2018나2002958
용역대금반환 등 청구의 소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs who cited the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations of the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance is presented to this court, the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justified.

Accordingly, the reasoning for this Court concerning this case is as follows, given that the reasoning for the first instance judgment is identical to that for which part of the appeal is made, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

In Part 3, the "instant development project" in Part 9 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be "PM services related to the instant development project".

Part IV of the decision of the court of first instance is "," and the agreement under the agreement of this case is "the agreement of this case".

Each "Witness K" in the attached Forms 8 and 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be referred to as "K of the court of first instance".

Each "agreement" in Part 5, Part 5, Part 5, 8, 13, and 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be "Agreement", and each "Preparation" in Part 5, 8, and 13 shall be deemed to be "Conclusion".

The defendant added "(1) in front of the judgment of the first instance court," "(7) in the first instance court," "(2) in the first instance court," "(2) in the first instance court," "(3) in the first instance court in the first instance court," and "(3) in the first instance court in the first instance court," "(4)." The first instance court in the 8th instance court in the second instance court, "(8), 10, 114, 15, and 15 of the evidence submitted by the defendant in the first instance court in the first instance court in the first instance court, "(39, 40 (including number number; hereinafter the same shall apply)" in the first instance court, "The whole purport of the pleadings" in the second instance court in the first instance court, "No. 18 of the agreement of this case," and "No. 1,3,8, 10, 114, 15, and the witness evidence submitted by the defendant in the first instance court as follows.

(2) there is a significant imbalance between the payment and the consideration.

arrow