Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 29, 2017, the Defendant’s “E convenience store” operated by the victim D, which was operated by the victim D, the Government-Si around 23:10 on April 29, 2017, defective personnel affairs of the Defendant who used to store the victim, and the victim’s “confisc with the voice?”

C. The author interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by harming the victim’s convenience store business by harming the victim’s entrance by avoiding the disturbance of approximately 20 minutes of the victim’s mouth from the victim who was frighter and frighter on several occasions. The frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter, and frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter, and frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter, and frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter frighter.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. CCTV video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written victims;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the crime committed during the period of repeated crime.

However, in consideration of the fact that the injured party does not want the punishment of the defendant by compensating the injured party for 500,000 won and by the original agreement, a fine like the order shall be imposed against the accused.