The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On October 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around October 19, 2013, when a person takes a dog at the house or in a public place, such as a park, at the “D playground in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu”, the Defendant neglected his/her duty of care to keep the dog of the dog being raised (infin, female, 3 years old) being raised by neglecting his/her duty of care in order to prevent any harm to others, despite the fact that the proprietor has a strong string line, and caused the damage to the victim E (12 years old) who was playing in his/her place at the time when he/she got out of the bar and got out of it from the bar, thereby causing the injury of the number of days of treatment, such as paradar, etc.

2. The above facts charged are the crimes falling under Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the records, it can be recognized that the victim expressed his/her intent not to punish the defendant on March 26, 2014, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.