The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person who satatat in the Gyeyang-gu B and in the park in the Jeonjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

A person who raises a dog has a duty of care to prevent a dog from being deprived of another person by safely binding the dog so that the dog does not protect another person.

Nevertheless, at around 18:00 on July 18, 2020, the Defendant suffered from the victim, who had the right side of the victim C, who had the upper part of the victim C, who had the upper part of the upper part of the upper part and had the upper part of the upper part, and had the upper part of the upper part, who had the upper part of the upper part, and had the upper part of the upper part, who had the upper part of the upper part, for about two weeks of treatment.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 266 (2) of the Criminal Act.

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act (written revocation of complaint filed on November 16, 2020);