Defendant

A Imprisonment for four months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 1,00,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 8, 2018, Defendant A: (a) around 10:04, at E entertainment tavern, a defendant on the first floor of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, worked as an employee; and (b) at the time of dispute over the issue of non-payment of the price, Defendant A’s criminal facts are corrected by reflecting the description stated in paragraph (2) of the revised facts charged that the victim tried to destroy the defendant’s title in the following.

Around 8 weeks of the victim's face was taken one time as food, and the victim suffered injury, such as an internal and safrat, which requires treatment for about 8 weeks.

2. While Defendant C and B were dissatisfied with the victim A and the victim at the time and place described in the preceding paragraph as stated in the preceding paragraph, Defendant C and the victim were assaulted by both descendants by keeping the victim’s chest and drinking faces once. Defendant B attempted to destroy the victim’s neck by selling it behind the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The witness A’s legal statement (as to the defendant B and C),

1. A criminal investigation report (CCTV image verification);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of each statute on photographs of damage;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment

B. Defendant B and C: Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines

1. Defendant B and C at a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Determination on the assertion of Defendant B and defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. The gist of the claim is that Defendant B unilaterally committed a fighting between the victim A and C, and that there was no assault against the victim, such as the victim’s fighting fighting with the victim’s fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting.

2. The victim A.